Source hierarchy

  1. UK primary statute (Employment Rights Act 1996, Equality Act 2010, National Minimum Wage Act 1998, Working Time Regulations 1998, and others).
  2. UK case law: Supreme Court, Court of Appeal, Employment Appeal Tribunal; first-tier Tribunal where binding for context.
  3. ACAS Codes of Practice and EHRC Codes (statutory and non-statutory).
  4. Academic and treatise sources (Tolley, IDS Handbook, IDS Brief).
  5. News and policy commentary — only as supporting context, never as a citation.

Four things we never do

  • No specific legal advice on your case in free content. Our guides are general guidance; paid services are where named legal advice happens.
  • No paid alteration of editorial content. No advertiser, sponsor, panel solicitor or employer can change what a guide says, which articles appear in search, or how a case is summarised.
  • No paid alteration of law summaries or statute pages. A panel solicitor reviewing a paid order does not influence how that area of law is summarised elsewhere on the platform.
  • No removal of accurate court reporting. If a future feature publishes tribunal outcomes, employers cannot pay to take them down. Inaccuracies are corrected via Corrections; accurate reporting stands.

The editorial firewall

NureWorker pays panel UK solicitors to review paid deliverables and to sample a percentage of paid AI answers. They have a commercial relationship with us.

The firewall is structural: solicitors reviewing paid orders cannot see editorial content authorship, cannot influence which articles publish, and cannot edit the AI prompts. The solicitors who sample answers cannot themselves write the canonical content that drives the AI’s answers.

Future sponsored or partnership placements will be visually distinct from editorial content and labelled “Sponsored”. Editorial choices about what’s in the library and how it’s framed are made by NureWorker’s content team, not by sponsors.

Corrections

See something wrong? Use the corrections form. Verified fixes flow into a new article revision and are credited in What’s new.

Reviewer protection

We do not publish the individual names of solicitor reviewers on the public site. This is a deliberate choice to decouple content credibility from any single solicitor’s practice and to protect reviewers from employer-led pressure. The list of vetted panel solicitors is maintained under SRA-authorised identification internally.

Review cadence

Every published article carries a last-reviewed date. Articles older than 12 months without a re-review are flagged on the page (yellow banner) and re-queued for panel-solicitor read. See our methodology for the checks that run on every paid answer.

Last reviewed: May 2026. Quarterly review cadence.